← ModelRumors.ai buyer's guide
HEAD TO HEAD · UPDATED NOV 6, 2026
Muse Wonder vs Grok 4.7
Meta against xAI, on sourced numbers only. Green marks the higher (or cheaper) value on each row; the text below only calls a lead when the gap is bigger than measurement noise.
| Muse Wonder | Grok 4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Arena Elo | 1507 source ↗ | 1441 source ↗ |
| GPQA Diamond | not published | not published |
| $ per 1M in / out | $4 / $20 source ↗ | $2 / $6 source ↗ |
| Blended $ per 1M (3:1) | $8.00 source ↗ | $3.00 source ↗ |
| Context window | not published | 500K source ↗ |
| Output speed | not published | 72 tok/s source ↗ |
| Released | Oct 12, 2026 source ↗ | Sep 21, 2026 source ↗ |
| Open weights | No source ↗ | No source ↗ |
| Reasoning effort tiers | minimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · max (default: not stated) | low · medium · high · xhigh (default: high) |
| API effort control | reasoning_effort="minimal" | "low" | "medium" | "high" | "xhigh" | "max" (Chat Completions) source ↗ | reasoning_effort="low" | "medium" | "high" | "xhigh" source ↗ |
| Additional benchmarks | Arena Text: 1507 (#4, Max effort) source ↗ | DeepSWE v1.1: 71.0% source ↗ CursorBench 4.0: 46.3% source ↗ AA Intelligence Index v5.0.1: 35 (xhigh) source ↗ |
| Best for (workload) | Meta's highest-ranked model on Arena Text (1507, #4 at Max effort). The API is in preview. source ↗ | xAI's flagship. Reasoning is always on and cannot be turned off; 500K context; 71.0% on DeepSWE v1.1 (xAI). source ↗ |
Arena Elo from the arena.ai text leaderboard as of Oct 27, 2026 source ↗. Speed measured by Artificial Analysis and varies by provider.
Which one should I use?
For high-volume work where cost matters most, Grok 4.7 is about 2.7 times cheaper per token. For overall answer quality as rated by people in blind tests, Muse Wonder leads clearly (1507 vs 1441 Arena Elo). On release timing, Meta is at day 22 of a typical ~14-day gap (PAST TYPICAL GAP), and xAI is at day 46 of a typical ~46-day gap (PAST TYPICAL GAP).
Key differences from the sourced numbers
- Grok 4.7 is the cheaper option: $3.00 vs $8.00 per 1M tokens at a 3:1 input-to-output mix (about 2.7 times less).
- Muse Wonder scores 66 Elo points higher (1507 vs 1441) on the Arena text leaderboard, where people vote on blind side-by-side answers.
- Muse Wonder pricing note: Meta Model API, in preview.
- Grok 4.7 pricing note: Prompts under 200K tokens; $4 / $12 above 200K.
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Wonder or Grok 4.7 better?
Grok 4.7 is the cheaper option: $3.00 vs $8.00 per 1M tokens at a 3:1 input-to-output mix (about 2.7 times less). Muse Wonder scores 66 Elo points higher (1507 vs 1441) on the Arena text leaderboard, where people vote on blind side-by-side answers. Muse Wonder pricing note: Meta Model API, in preview. Grok 4.7 pricing note: Prompts under 200K tokens; $4 / $12 above 200K.
Which one should I use: Muse Wonder or Grok 4.7?
For high-volume work where cost matters most, Grok 4.7 is about 2.7 times cheaper per token. For overall answer quality as rated by people in blind tests, Muse Wonder leads clearly (1507 vs 1441 Arena Elo). On release timing, Meta is at day 22 of a typical ~14-day gap (PAST TYPICAL GAP), and xAI is at day 46 of a typical ~46-day gap (PAST TYPICAL GAP).
How much does Muse Wonder cost compared with Grok 4.7?
Muse Wonder lists at $4 / $20 per 1M input/output tokens ($8.00/1M blended at 3:1). Grok 4.7 lists at $2 / $6 per 1M input/output tokens ($3.00/1M blended at 3:1).
Facts checked Nov 5, 2026 against official sources. Every number links to its source. Spotted an error? Email [email protected].