← ModelRumors.ai buyer's guide

HEAD TO HEAD · UPDATED NOV 6, 2026

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Spark Open

Anthropic against Meta, on sourced numbers only. Green marks the higher (or cheaper) value on each row; the text below only calls a lead when the gap is bigger than measurement noise.

Claude Opus 5.5Muse Spark Open
Arena Elo1509 source ↗not published
GPQA Diamond90.6% source ↗89.0% source ↗
$ per 1M in / out$4 / $20 source ↗$1.25 / $4.25 source ↗
Blended $ per 1M (3:1)$8.00 source ↗$2.00 source ↗
Context window1M source ↗1M source ↗
Output speed110 tok/s source ↗153 tok/s source ↗
ReleasedSep 22, 2026 source ↗Oct 15, 2026 source ↗
Open weightsNo source ↗Yes source ↗
Reasoning effort tierslow · medium · high · xhigh · max (default: medium)not verified (default: not stated)
API effort controloutput_config={"effort": "low" | "medium" | "high" | "xhigh" | "max"} source ↗Not verified: reasoning controls depend on the host source ↗
Additional benchmarksArena WebDev: 1810 (#1) source ↗
SWE-bench Pro: 89.9% source ↗
Terminal-Bench 4.0: 66.4% (xhigh) source ↗
GDPval-AA v2.1: 1846 source ↗
CursorBench 4.0: 57.8% at max effort, 52.5% at default source ↗
AA Intelligence Index v5.0.1: 59 source ↗
Size: 816B total, 42B active (MoE) source ↗
Output speed: 153 tok/s, varies by host source ↗
Best for (workload)Anthropic suggests starting with Opus 5.5 for most workloads. #1 on Arena WebDev (1810); 66.4% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 at xhigh effort (Anthropic). source ↗Meta's large open-weights model (816B total, 42B active) with a 1M context window; 89.0% GPQA Diamond (Meta). source ↗

Arena Elo from the arena.ai text leaderboard as of Oct 27, 2026 source ↗. Speed measured by Artificial Analysis and varies by provider.

Which one should I use?

For high-volume work where cost matters most, Muse Spark Open is about 4.0 times cheaper per token. For latency-sensitive use such as live chat, Muse Spark Open is noticeably faster (153 vs 110 tokens per second). If you need to self-host or fine-tune, only Muse Spark Open has open weights. On release timing, Anthropic is at day 30 of a typical ~15-day gap (PAST TYPICAL GAP), and Meta is at day 22 of a typical ~14-day gap (PAST TYPICAL GAP).

Key differences from the sourced numbers

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 5.5 or Muse Spark Open better?

Muse Spark Open is the cheaper option: $2.00 vs $8.00 per 1M tokens at a 3:1 input-to-output mix (about 4.0 times less). On GPQA Diamond they are close (90.6% vs 89.0%). Muse Spark Open streams output faster: 153 vs 110 tokens per second (Artificial Analysis). Claude Opus 5.5 pricing note: Same rate across the full 1M context window. Muse Spark Open pricing note: Hosted price on OpenRouter (ID meta/muse-spark-open) and Together AI (ID meta-models/Muse-Spark-Open-816B-A42B). Open weights under the Muse Model License.

Which one should I use: Claude Opus 5.5 or Muse Spark Open?

For high-volume work where cost matters most, Muse Spark Open is about 4.0 times cheaper per token. For latency-sensitive use such as live chat, Muse Spark Open is noticeably faster (153 vs 110 tokens per second). If you need to self-host or fine-tune, only Muse Spark Open has open weights. On release timing, Anthropic is at day 30 of a typical ~15-day gap (PAST TYPICAL GAP), and Meta is at day 22 of a typical ~14-day gap (PAST TYPICAL GAP).

How much does Claude Opus 5.5 cost compared with Muse Spark Open?

Claude Opus 5.5 lists at $4 / $20 per 1M input/output tokens ($8.00/1M blended at 3:1). Muse Spark Open lists at $1.25 / $4.25 per 1M input/output tokens ($2.00/1M blended at 3:1).

Anthropic lab hub →Meta lab hub → Compare by effort level & use case → Compare any two models

Facts checked Nov 5, 2026 against official sources. Every number links to its source. Spotted an error? Email [email protected].