← ModelRumors.ai buyer's guide

HEAD TO HEAD · UPDATED NOV 6, 2026

GPT-6.1 Sol vs DeepSeek V4.1-Flash

OpenAI against DeepSeek, on sourced numbers only. Green marks the higher (or cheaper) value on each row; the text below only calls a lead when the gap is bigger than measurement noise.

GPT-6.1 SolDeepSeek V4.1-Flash
Arena Elo1481 source ↗1476 source ↗
GPQA Diamondnot published90.9% source ↗
$ per 1M in / out$2 / $10 source ↗$0.15 / $0.60 source ↗
Blended $ per 1M (3:1)$4.00 source ↗$0.26 source ↗
Context window1.05M source ↗1M source ↗
Output speednot published174 tok/s source ↗
ReleasedSep 29, 2026 source ↗Sep 10, 2026 source ↗
Open weightsNo source ↗Yes source ↗
Reasoning effort tierslow · medium · high · xhigh · max (default: medium)low · high · max (default: high)
API effort controlreasoning={"effort": "low" | "medium" | "high" | "xhigh" | "max"} source ↗thinking={"type": "enabled" | "disabled"}, reasoning_effort="low" | "high" | "max" (medium and xhigh map to high) source ↗
Additional benchmarksAA Intelligence Index v5.0.1: 55 (Max) source ↗DeepSWE v1.1: 77.0% (Oct 17 update; 74.2% on Sep 10) source ↗
Best for (workload)OpenAI's near-Astra model at one-fifth of Astra's token price, with a 1.05M-token context window. source ↗Fastest output we track (174 tok/s, Artificial Analysis) and the lowest list price ($0.15 / $0.60 off-peak); MIT open weights. source ↗

Arena Elo from the arena.ai text leaderboard as of Oct 27, 2026 source ↗. Speed measured by Artificial Analysis and varies by provider.

Which one should I use?

For high-volume work where cost matters most, DeepSeek V4.1-Flash is about 15.2 times cheaper per token. If you need to self-host or fine-tune, only DeepSeek V4.1-Flash has open weights. On release timing, OpenAI is at day 11 of a typical ~23-day gap (ADOPT NOW · FRESH RELEASE), and DeepSeek is at day 20 of a typical ~32-day gap (MID-CYCLE).

Key differences from the sourced numbers

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-6.1 Sol or DeepSeek V4.1-Flash better?

DeepSeek V4.1-Flash is the cheaper option: $0.26 vs $4.00 per 1M tokens at a 3:1 input-to-output mix (about 15.2 times less). On the Arena text leaderboard they are close (1481 vs 1476): a gap under 20 points is within the leaderboard's margin of error. GPT-6.1 Sol pricing note: Prompts up to 272K tokens; $4 / $15 above 272K. OpenAI describes Sol as near-Astra at lower cost. DeepSeek V4.1-Flash pricing note: Off-peak price (cache hit $0.003 / 1M). Peak hours (01:00 to 04:00 and 06:00 to 10:00 UTC, weekdays): $0.30 / $1.20 (cache hit $0.006 / 1M).

Which one should I use: GPT-6.1 Sol or DeepSeek V4.1-Flash?

For high-volume work where cost matters most, DeepSeek V4.1-Flash is about 15.2 times cheaper per token. If you need to self-host or fine-tune, only DeepSeek V4.1-Flash has open weights. On release timing, OpenAI is at day 11 of a typical ~23-day gap (ADOPT NOW · FRESH RELEASE), and DeepSeek is at day 20 of a typical ~32-day gap (MID-CYCLE).

How much does GPT-6.1 Sol cost compared with DeepSeek V4.1-Flash?

GPT-6.1 Sol lists at $2 / $10 per 1M input/output tokens ($4.00/1M blended at 3:1). DeepSeek V4.1-Flash lists at $0.15 / $0.60 per 1M input/output tokens ($0.26/1M blended at 3:1).

OpenAI lab hub →DeepSeek lab hub → Compare by effort level & use case → Compare any two models

Facts checked Nov 5, 2026 against official sources. Every number links to its source. Spotted an error? Email [email protected].