← ModelRumors.ai buyer's guide

HEAD TO HEAD · UPDATED NOV 6, 2026

Gemini 4 Argon vs DeepSeek V4-Pro

Google DeepMind against DeepSeek, on sourced numbers only. Green marks the higher (or cheaper) value on each row; the text below only calls a lead when the gap is bigger than measurement noise.

Gemini 4 ArgonDeepSeek V4-Pro
Arena Elo1520 source ↗1465 source ↗
GPQA Diamond96.4% source ↗92.4% source ↗
$ per 1M in / out$2 / $10 source ↗$0.66 / $1.98 source ↗
Blended $ per 1M (3:1)$4.00 source ↗$0.99 source ↗
Context window1M source ↗1M source ↗
Output speed74 tok/s source ↗not published
ReleasedOct 13, 2026 source ↗Aug 13, 2026 source ↗
Open weightsNo source ↗Yes source ↗
Reasoning effort tierslow · medium · high (default: medium)low · high · max (default: high)
API effort controlthinking_config={"thinking_level": "low" | "medium" | "high"} source ↗thinking={"type": "enabled" | "disabled"}, reasoning_effort="low" | "high" | "max" (medium and xhigh map to high) source ↗
Additional benchmarksDeepSWE v1.1: 77.9% source ↗
AA Intelligence Index v5.0.1: 50 (High) source ↗
SWE-bench Verified: 80.6% (April V4 preview card, Max) source ↗
Best for (workload)Highest GPQA Diamond score we track (96.4%, Epoch AI) and the top Arena Text score among models you can use today (1520). source ↗Higher GPQA Diamond than V4.1-Flash (92.4% vs 90.9%, DeepSeek); MIT open weights. source ↗

Arena Elo from the arena.ai text leaderboard as of Oct 27, 2026 source ↗. Speed measured by Artificial Analysis and varies by provider.

Which one should I use?

For high-volume work where cost matters most, DeepSeek V4-Pro is about 4.0 times cheaper per token. For overall answer quality as rated by people in blind tests, Gemini 4 Argon leads clearly (1520 vs 1465 Arena Elo). For hard science and analysis questions, Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on GPQA Diamond (96.4% vs 92.4%). If you need to self-host or fine-tune, only DeepSeek V4-Pro has open weights. On release timing, Google DeepMind is at day 24 of a typical ~32-day gap (MID-CYCLE), and DeepSeek is at day 20 of a typical ~32-day gap (MID-CYCLE).

Key differences from the sourced numbers

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 4 Argon or DeepSeek V4-Pro better?

DeepSeek V4-Pro is the cheaper option: $0.99 vs $4.00 per 1M tokens at a 3:1 input-to-output mix (about 4.0 times less). Gemini 4 Argon scores 55 Elo points higher (1520 vs 1465) on the Arena text leaderboard, where people vote on blind side-by-side answers. On GPQA Diamond, graduate-level science questions, Gemini 4 Argon leads 96.4% to 92.4%. Gemini 4 Argon pricing note: Introductory price until Nov 30, 2026; $4 / $20 from Dec 1. No higher rate for long prompts. DeepSeek V4-Pro pricing note: Off-peak price (cache hit $0.022 / 1M). Peak hours (01:00 to 04:00 and 06:00 to 10:00 UTC, weekdays): $1.32 / $3.96 (cache hit $0.044 / 1M). API continues until V4.1-Pro launches.

Which one should I use: Gemini 4 Argon or DeepSeek V4-Pro?

For high-volume work where cost matters most, DeepSeek V4-Pro is about 4.0 times cheaper per token. For overall answer quality as rated by people in blind tests, Gemini 4 Argon leads clearly (1520 vs 1465 Arena Elo). For hard science and analysis questions, Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on GPQA Diamond (96.4% vs 92.4%). If you need to self-host or fine-tune, only DeepSeek V4-Pro has open weights. On release timing, Google DeepMind is at day 24 of a typical ~32-day gap (MID-CYCLE), and DeepSeek is at day 20 of a typical ~32-day gap (MID-CYCLE).

How much does Gemini 4 Argon cost compared with DeepSeek V4-Pro?

Gemini 4 Argon lists at $2 / $10 per 1M input/output tokens ($4.00/1M blended at 3:1). DeepSeek V4-Pro lists at $0.66 / $1.98 per 1M input/output tokens ($0.99/1M blended at 3:1).

Google DeepMind lab hub →DeepSeek lab hub → Compare by effort level & use case → Compare any two models

Facts checked Nov 5, 2026 against official sources. Every number links to its source. Spotted an error? Email [email protected].