← Back to ModelRumors.ai Interactive 5-Axis Radar Duel

HEAD-TO-HEAD FRONTIER BENCHMARK DUEL · UPDATED NOVEMBER 4, 2026

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

Quick Verdict: Route autonomous coding to Claude Sonnet 5.5 (82.9% SWE-bench Verified), hard scientific reasoning to DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (91.8% GPQA Diamond), and high-volume cost-sensitive workloads to DeepSeek V4.1 Flash.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Anthropic)
92.8 pt
SWE: 82.9% · GPQA: 91.4% · $3.00/1M · Adopt Now
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (DeepSeek (MIT))
89.7 pt
SWE: 79.5% · GPQA: 91.8% · $0.22/1M · Hold Cluster (R3 Near)
Compare Live on 5-Axis Radar & Cost Calculator